Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X6 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 575 HP | 249 - 530 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 740 NM | 450 - 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.6 seconds | 4.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 6.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X6. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1530 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`119 kg | ~ 2`889 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`251 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 868 kg | ~ 682 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than BMW X6. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 56 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |