Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 575 HP | 231 - 462 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 740 NM | 450 - 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.6 seconds | 4.7 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 2.0 - 11.6 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`119 kg | ~ 2`957 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`251 kg | ~ 2`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 868 kg | ~ 712 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 50 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |