Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X3 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 575 HP | 184 - 382 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 740 NM | 290 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.6 seconds | 4.8 - 8.3 seconds | |
| In general, BMW X3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 12.8 | 5.4 - 10.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 17 cm longer than the BMW X3, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 230 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`119 kg | ~ 2`486 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`251 kg | ~ 1`868 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 868 kg | ~ 618 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X3 has
| |