Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 40 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 36 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |