Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 80 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1604 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 118 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 3008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Peugeot 3008 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |