Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 16 HP more power than Jeep Patriot, whereas torque is 197 NM more than Jeep Patriot. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Patriot, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Patriot might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm shorter than the Jeep Patriot, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1777 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 102 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |