Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 15 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 28 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |