Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Yaris) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 57 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 247 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise. One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 56 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 275 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |