Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs BMW X3 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 7 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW X3 2012 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X3 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 29 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW X3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X3 has
| |