Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |