Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 15 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`715 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 635 kg | 700 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Land Rover Freelander. Therefore, Land Rover Freelander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |