Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

 
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 -
Toyota C-HR
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP116 HP
Torque: 400 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds11.4 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.3
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
740 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XFUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.36 m
Width: 1.90 m1.80 m
Height: 1.61 m1.56 m
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres377 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 173 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3501`930
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 60018 400
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Toyota C-HR has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv