Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Toyota C-HR are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 377 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 173 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`865 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 19 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |