Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2013 - 2015
Suzuki SX4
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP120 HP
Torque: 400 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds12 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.54.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 345 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1350 km on highway
740 km with real consumption1020 km with real consumption
Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery SportUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.36 m4.30 m
Width: 1.90 m1.77 m
Height: 1.61 m1.58 m
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm longer than the Suzuki SX4, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1269 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 120 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`350 kg1`870 kg
Net weight:1`715 kg1`240 kg
Load capacity:635 kg630 kg
Safety:
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12 4006200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
Suzuki SX4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv