Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 60 NM more than Seat Ateca. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 40 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |