Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, but torque is 17 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine Hyundai ix35 2013 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 41 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |