Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda HR-V. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 4.0 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1456 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 157 litres more trunk space than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Honda HR-V is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |