Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Dacia Duster 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 40 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
740 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 445 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 105 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`819 | |
Safety: | |||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Dacia Duster is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |