Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 27 HP less power than Audi Q3, but torque is 20 NM more than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |