Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP less power than Audi Q3, but torque is 20 NM more than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1365 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |