Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |