Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 30 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X3 has
| |