Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |