Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 68 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 145 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |