Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 725 kg | 630 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |