Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 725 kg | 630 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |