Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and BMW X3 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM more than BMW X3. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 67 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 30 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X3 has
| |