Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Volvo XC60 have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM more than Volvo XC60. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 29 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |