Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 123 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 184 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 47 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm longer than the Suzuki SX4, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 120 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.9 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |