Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 118 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 48 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
| |