Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 60 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Cupra Ateca, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |