Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs BMW X2 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 100 HP more power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW X2. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija, BMW 4 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW X2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine: The B38 1.5-liter three-cylinder petrol engine, introduced in 2013, was designed with a focus on fuel efficiency and low emissions to meet modern environmental standards. While it received generally positive ... More about BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and BMW X2 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 80 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`005 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 26 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
BMW X2 has
| |