Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 60 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi Q3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1365 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 680 kg | 525 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Audi Q3. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |