Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 28 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |