Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |