Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 170 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |