Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.5 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 28 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |