Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 82 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 142 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 11 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |