Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 29 HP more power than Audi Q5, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 28 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |