Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1383 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |