Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023 vs Volkswagen T-Cross 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen T-Cross) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 54 HP more power than Volkswagen T-Cross, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Volkswagen T-Cross. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Cross, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.13 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1281 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen T-Cross may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volkswagen T-Cross, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | 1`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`866 kg | 1`326 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 624 kg | 474 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Volkswagen T-Cross. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Volkswagen T-Cross has
| |