Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2020 vs Audi Q2 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Audi Q2) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 50 HP more power than Audi Q2, whereas torque is 290 NM more than Audi Q2. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.9 l/100km + 19.1 kWh/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Audi Q2 2018 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi Q2 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.51 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1383 litres | 1050 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 186 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q2. The Audi Q2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.8 metres more than that of the Audi Q2, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`660 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q2 has
| |