Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Peugeot 3008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 30 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 3008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Peugeot 3008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 159 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |