Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 416 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 6 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 14 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 26 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 539 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 52 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The Hyundai Tucson may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`315 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |