Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 190 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |