Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 48 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 190 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.30 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 30 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |