Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 70 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |