Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Peugeot 2008 2019 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.53 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 405 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1467 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 186 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 1`715 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 34 000 | 22 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |