Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque torque is 183 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1206 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 207 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 40 400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |