Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1383 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 161 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 1`969 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |