Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Kia XCeed 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 14 HP more power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia XCeed. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.4 | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.48 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm shorter than the Kia XCeed, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 211 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The Kia XCeed may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Kia XCeed has
| |