Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 54 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | Used also on Jaguar F-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 601 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1383 litres | 1386 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |